Friday, March 23, 2012

The Root Of All Evil


I cannot count the number of times I have heard that the Bible says money is the root of all evil. If you search the Bible to find this you will be disappointed because the Bible doesn’t say it. What it does say is the love of money is the root of all evil. I think this is more than a distinction without a difference. There is nothing wrong with having money but there is a whole lot wrong with loving it. Take Warren Buffett for example. Buffett is 81 years old. He has 44 billion dollars and he is the third richest man in the world. He lives in a modest home in Nebraska and drives his own car. It has been reported that Buffett doesn’t really care about money he just enjoys making it. He is like a chef who doesn’t care about food, but just enjoys cooking it. Buffett has been called a great philanthropist but all I have ever heard is he plans to leave 99% of his estate to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Whatever he has donated over the years has not made a dent in his net worth. Unlike Facebook's Mark Zuckerman who gave 100 million dollars to the Newark Public Schools, I have never heard of Buffett doing much to help improve the lot of Americans living at or below the poverty line, or decrying the state of our educational system.   I have not heard of Buffett helping citizens who lost their homes, their savings, who cannot afford to send their children to college.  When Americans lost 10 trillion dollars in equity as a result of the financial crisis of 2008, Buffett remained one of the richest men in the world.  Buffett made money investing in companies who received bailout money. Since the start of the financial crisis he has made lucrative profits in Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, and General Electric.  It has never been reported that Buffett has ever tried to persuade financial institutions to make any widespread effort to help homeowners who are underwater on their mortgages, even those who have been diligent in their payments.  Why?  Because such an effort would impact his return on his investments.  Buffett says that the rich should pay more in taxes but he has yet to pick up his pen and write a check to the IRS. I have never heard that he even returns his social security check.  And while he doesn’t purchase the big houses, cars, and boats, he does use his money to acquire power.  Buffett delights in being called the Oracle of Omaha. He is like EF Hutton, when he speaks, people listen. The so-called Buffett Rule is hailed as the solution to our tax problem. His op-eds are talked about for weeks. When he is interviewed he never wipes the smile from his face.

I believe that Buffett loves money, because he loves power. President Obama has not invited the poor, the unemployed, the underemployed, and members of the dwindling middle class to the White House to give him advice on entitlements, homelessness, poverty, or jobs. Buffett is a regular visitor.  In spite of the fact that Americans made the Buffetts of the world rich because these people bought their goods and services, the rich don't offer the President advice on how to rebuild the middle class because they no longer need the middle class. There are only about 150 million American workers but there are millions more in China and India.  The rich don't offer advice on how to bring the gas prices down because they have no problem paying these prices.  Don’t be fooled by the rhetoric that alternative sources of energy is the real solution to high gas prices,  the rich see this as the new source of wealth. They tout the need for wind, solar and electricity, yet they love it that GM made a huge profit on vehicles that use gasoline. They push the Chevy Volt which cost $40,000.00 and which has been recalled due to problems with the lithium battery.  The rich talk out of both sides of their mouth.  They give advice which keeps the cost of gas at $5.00 a gallon (helping the oil companies), extolling the virtues of buying American cars (keeping the automotive industry profitable), and focusing on wind and solar energy (tomorrow’s source of wealth).  Making gasoline affordable is not on the agenda of the rich and powerful. Affordability is so yesterday. That small change adds up to a lot is passé. Today, there is not a need behind every decision made in Washington, only a dollar.

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t begrudge Buffett making money. I want everyone to make money and lots of it. I would never subscribe to putting a cap on earnings nor would I want to impose taxes on the rich to punish them for their success. The haves do create the jobs. Yet, we have to remember that but for the have-nots, people like Buffett would have very little. But for the taxpayers paying for the roads, the military, the fire departments, and the police, the rich would not be able to transport their goods or be safe in their homes and businesses.

When the love of money takes precedent over the social contract, a contract that provided for all Americans to have an equal opportunity to succeed or fail in a system that was only partially rigged, we end up with greed, 20 million people unemployed or underemployed, and ultimately resentment.

I think the love of money is what is at the core of America’s problems because we can never get enough of what we love.

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Facts Can Sometimes Get In The Way


When I was a young girl I didn't always distinguish between fact and fiction. Facts made me unhappy while fiction allowed my imagination to go to the most beautiful places. For starters, I believed I would fall in love with the man of my dreams and live happily ever after.  I would go to the movies every Sunday and watch love stories that always ended with the man and woman getting together against all odds. No matter how difficult the circumstances, the story had a happy ending. When my first relationship ended poorly, I simply chalked it up to a bad choice. The man of my dreams was still out there looking for me. I never thought about what happened after the movie announced "The End." The movies never took me beyond that last kiss to the day of the divorce. I was living in a fiction where I remained for many years. That I would live happily ever after was one of my earliest fictions and the one I found hardest to stop believing. But once I did things were never the same again.

Second, I believed that every country should have a two party system and all people wanted to live in a democracy with our Constitution and Bill of Rights. Whenever I would hear about the citizens of the former Soviet Union only having one choice when they went to the polls to vote, I was grateful that things were not like that here in America. I never considered that we only had two choices and more importantly we had no choice in our choices. We were fortunate to be able to speak our minds without the fear of having our doors kicked in and being arrested because we had spoken out against some politician or political party.  I remained in this belief until the New York Times published the Pentagon Papers exposing the truth about the Vietnam War and Daniel Ellsberg's life became a living hell. Ellsberg threatened the status quo. I was starting to learn that sitting in a barroom yelling to kick the bums out is not the free speech the Founders had in mind. It was not the free speech that needed protecting. 

Third, I believed there was an American Dream. If you worked hard, kept your nose clean, you could succeed. It didn't matter that success was always measured in terms of material possessions. The proof that you had made it was whether you owned a car or a house. As years passed, whether you had graduated from high school or whether you had a degree or profession were added to the mix. But even higher education was not for the mind it was for the pocketbook. I remember the time when a family could sacrifice and save its money to send the kids to college. Today, the whole neighborhood could save the money and few if any kids would have enough money to go to college.  Today, the debt from student loans has exceeded the entire credit card debt.  And if one of these kids were to invent a light bulb that never blew out, the major manufacturers of light bulbs would lobby politicians to pass legislation putting a height requirement on light bulb inventors.

Fourth, I believed that unions helped create the middle class.  After laws were passed giving workers the right to organize and bargain collectively with management, wages did increase. Unfortunately as the workers saw this increase in their paychecks, employers saw an increase in their profits. Eventually, the disparity in earnings between management and labor grew so wide that much of the gains brought about by unions went by the wayside. In those industries where labor continued to enjoy these gains, management simply picked up its ball and outsourced. Of course as unions became more powerful and politically connected it became increasingly difficult to tell the difference between the friends and the enemies of the middle class.  Union leaders started having a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. The disparity in income between the haves and the havenots has become so great that today 47% of households don't earn enough to pay federal income taxes. The number of people below the official poverty line is the highest in 52 years. Americans are going to bed hungry while farmers are still being paid not to grow food. We use enough corn each year in making ethanol to feed over 300 million people. Grass would make more ethanol but there is not enough profit in grass. Putting corn in our cars has caused the price of food to rise greater than the rate of inflation. We are in danger of becoming a third world country.

Fifth, I believed that the financial crisis of 2008 would open up everyone's eye to the fact that no matter how much money Wall Street was making, greed would insure it would not be enough. Yet we suspended our disbelieve thinking that a new president would solve the problem. I think President Obama had good intentions but consider what he has done in the face of this crisis. He brought Lawrence Summers, Timothy Geitner, and Jeffrey Inmelt into his administration. Summers was Treasury Secretary under Bill Clinton. It was during the Clinton Administration that the Glass Steagall Act was repealed and commercial banks were allowed to invest in mortgage-backed securities and take on collateralized debt obligations. Summers in his testimony before Congress in 1998 said the banks could be trusted. "The parties to these kinds of contract," he said, "are largely sophisticated financial institutions that would appear to be eminently capable of protecting themselves from fraud and counterparty insolvencies and most of which are already subject to basic safety and soundness regulation under existing banking and securities laws." Instead of relegating Summers and his policies into the back alley where they belonged, Obama made him the director of the National Economic Council. Obama is now considering nominating him to head the World Bank. Geitner was head of the New York Federal Reserve Bank during the financial crisis. He helped these "trusted banks" get the bailout. Once Obama got into office, Geitner was named Treasury Secretary. As for Inmelt, the Chairman and CEO of General Electric, it has been reported that he secured up to 182 billion dollars in bailout money at a time when GE was one of the most profitable companies in the world and was one of the leading outsourcer of jobs. Last year Obama named Inmelt to head up his Jobs Council. While serving in this capacity, GE has continued to move more of its infrastructure to China.   Cronyism is no new in America, but now it is out in the open because there is no attempt to hide it.  But when crony capitalism begins to destroy even a semblance of free market capitalism, we will not return from the brink of disaster.  We will down in history as just another great power that destroyed itself.  

So what can you and I do about this? We could start by giving up the fictions and start facing facts.  The answer is not to go from one of the political choices to the other.  A Republican President will not change things anymore than Obama is able to change things.  The only thing those in leadership understand, be they in Washington, Wall Street, or the corporate board rooms, is money and power.  We could stop allowing their opium to be our drug of choice.  We could follow the lead of that young woman who used the social media to take on Bank of America. We could stop doing business with the banks who received bailout money.  We should put our money into neighborhood banks and credit unions and demand they be accountable.   We should also demand that those individuals who caused the crisis be punished not through imprisonment but by billions of dollars in fines.   Today, Wall Street is laughing at us. It did not even bother to wait until the heat was off before giving out millions of dollars in bonuses.  Banks that were said to be too big to fail have grown even bigger. They have increased their fees, refused to give loans or grant credit to individuals and small businesses, and raised their interest rates on credit cards.   The Financial Services' percentage of  GPD keeps growing yet it makes nothing we can use.  And if they try to intoxicate us with handouts, we could resist.  After we do these things, I suppose we could pray.

Thursday, March 8, 2012

Should We All Speak English?

The other day I was thinking about the number of Latinos who live in my community who do not speak English. This got me to thinking about other immigrants who have settled in this country over the last 100 or so years. Within the span of a generation the children of these immigrants were speaking English. There were no accommodations made. It was fish or cut bait.  Latinos now make up over 14% of the population, but how many of them are succeeding without knowing English? None of my research turned up an answer to this question but if I were to guess I would say very few. I would also guess that a large number of Latinos don’t speak English since just about everything is now in English and Spanish. I think they are the first group of immigrants that have not been required to fish or cut bait. Is there a reason for this? Is it the same reason that slaves were not allowed to read and write?

It was against the law in slave owning states to teach blacks to read and write for fear they would get ideas dangerous to the status quo.  The fear was so great that even after the end of slavery, blacks, who lived in the south and some border states, were poorly educated and required to attend segregated schools. It took 101 years after the Emancipation Proclamation for the Supreme Court to rule that separate schools were not equal. It took another 10 years for the passage of the Civil Rights Act.  African Americans have always known of the connection between quality of education on the one hand and second class status on the other. My parents and their parents knew this.  No liberals were patting them on the head saying there was an easier, softer way.   Of course, learning to speak correctly was one of the prerequisite to getting ahead.  If you doubt this, just ask Barack Obama.   Today, in spite of these gains, children of color, including Latinos, are once again segregated in the poorest performing schools with the highest drop out rate. They don't have books, pencils, and in some cases toilet paper. If they are fortunate enough to have a good teacher, that teacher is usually new, poorly paid, and the first to be laid off due to budget cuts.  I believe these conditions are by design because schools are again separate and unequal.  Keeping the status quo intact has been achieved.

Only recently have many Latin Americans countries, including Puerto Rico, required their citizens be educated.  Since mostly the poorest individuals have migrated to the United States, many Latinos do not know how to read or write well in their own language.  In this respect they are no different from the poor Irish or Italians who settled here.  However, unlike these other groups, Latinos have been told there is an easier, softer way.  They are accommodated.

Latino immigrants usually started off in menial jobs.   Years later their children are still in menial jobs.   I am reminded of a conversation I had a couple of months ago with a bright young 22 year old woman from the Dominican Republic. She had come to this country when she was 15 years old. She graduated from the local high school and she learned English; however her grammar was so bad my ears were hurting. She was working as a home health aide and most of her life was spent in a Latino community where she spoke only Spanish.  I asked her what she intended to do in the future. She said she hoped to continue as a home health aide.   I felt sad for her because she had no higher ambition.   This is one of the unintended consequences of accommodation.  So why have Latinos been accommodated?   I firmly believe it is to keep them picking the fruit, working for minimum wages, mopping the floors, and cleaning the toilets.   As for the young home health aide, she needs only to know enough English to get by which is not enough to get ahead.

Last night I attended a meeting with a number of Latinos. The group discussed the fact that our city was trying to pass an ordinance requiring all taxi cab drivers be able to read, write, and speak English. People were up in arms since so many of the drivers don’t know the language. In all the years I rode in cabs, I don’t remember needing the driver to read or write but it certainly helped that we could talk to each other.  I was probably only one of two people in the room who thought such an ordinance might not be a bad idea.  Of course, I was too much of a coward to share this with the group. Somehow, I got the feeling that what I thought would not go over very well.  I think accommodation is now part of the politically correct lexicon. Today I did share my concern about cab drivers with a young African American who lives in a nearby city. He informed me that there is a section of his city where the police ticket illegally parked cars which are driven mainly by Latinos who cannot read the parking signs. Thinking about this made me realize that it would be helpful for cabbies to be able to read signs. I decided to find out if an individual can get a driver's license without being able to read English.  I was surprised when I learned that Massachusetts offers the written test in over 25 languages. Massachusetts also offers an audio test in Spanish.  I guess when it comes to fees and fines, accommodation does have its advantages.  I just hope that everyone at least understands "do not" and “stop” when they are behind the wheel.

I think it is somewhat ironic that now that Latinos have political power, they will vote for politicians who encourage them to use it against themselves.  Rather than bite that bullet and learn English they have used their power to help maintain the status quo that slave holders worked so hard to protect.  It has long been said that one of the reasons this vast country is so rich and strong has been its common language (this is not to downplay the fact that it was stolen from Native Americans). Do we want to weaken the country or have we come up with some new and ingenious way to engage in racial,  ethnic. and class discrimination?  I think it is the latter. But it is having a weakening effect as well.  Lack of communication has been one of the leading causes of friction throughout all of history starting with the aftermath of the building of the Tower of Babel. I think it is the leading cause of opposition to comprehensive immigration reform. Remember, it is human nature to reject those we don't understand.   In time rejection turns into loathing.

Thursday, March 1, 2012

What Hole Did These Crazies Crawl Out Of?

After commanding Noah to build an ark and gather the female and male of each specie, God sent a great flood. Things must have been pretty bad then but could they have been any worse than they are now?

Today, Dr. Richard Land, a leader in the influential Southern Baptist Convention, said he does not consider Mitt Romney and other Mormons to be Christians – and likens Mormonism to Islam. I think that given all that is being said today by the so-Christians, Romney should consider this to be an endorsement.

This week a federal judge in Montana sent this email about Obama to his friends using a government computer:
                 "A little boy said to his mother; 'Mommy, how come I'm black and you're white?
                  His mother replied, 'Don't even go there Barack! From what I can remember about
                  that party, you're lucky you don't bark!'"

Apparently, this judge has some bad stuff on his mind.

Last week Santorum was against public education and compared our schools to factories. He called the President a snob because Obama said everyone should go to college. Santorum also thinks there is a connection between using contraceptives and girls having babies out of wedlock. He wanted to throw up when he read JFK's speech in which he said the wall between church and state should be absolute.   Of course, being the grandson of a coal miner, Santorum must have attended private school,  didn't go to college, law school, or business school.  Santorum must have gotten his three degrees from a Wheaties' cereal box.  How else would he know that that the solution to unwed motherhood is to ban contraceptives?

I know that every society has had its crazies. But today with the 24/7 news media, we are finding out who they are. Of the people who voted in the Michigan primary on Tuesday, the crazies represented around 38%. They agree with Santorum. How might things work out if everyone had to take an "Are You a Crazy" test before they could vote?

In the end Obama might just get reelected, not because of his record, but because the crazies are not only shooting themselves in the foot but they refuse to go back in their holes.  Maybe Newt Gingrich 
is on to something when he says we should colonize the moon.  There are no new worlds on earth to flee to get away from the impending flood.